From the report: "Governments all
over the world have discovered the world of social media, for better or for
worse. Whereas some of them are making every effort to prevent the
unhierarchical and therefore uncontrollable (dissident) opinion-forming process
in Web 2.0, others are looking for ways of putting the potentialities of this
new opening-up of communication to use. One approach that is increasingly being
tried out is opening up innovation processes in government.
However, this opening-up of innovation processes is anything but trivial. It
requires a thoroughly thought-out strategy and thus confronts government
systems with extensive challenges if it is not to suffer the same fate as other
unsuccessful attempts at reform in the past. In our essay, we reflect on the
consequences of these challenges for public managers." Read more
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Thursday, December 20, 2012
The Benefits of a Big Tent: Opening Up Government in Developing Countries
From the report: "Bringing open data and open government under a single
banner, Yu and Robinson argue, leads to conceptual muddling that ultimately impedes
progress for both projects. They express a concern that superficial commitments to open
data “can placate the public’s appetite for transparency.” Drawing on our experiences with the
Kenya Open Data Initiative and the Open Government Partnership, we argue that this need not
be the case for three reasons." Read more
Labels:
government,
open data,
reports
Thursday, December 13, 2012
U.S. Terrorism Agency to Tap a Vast Database of Citizens
Now, NCTC can copy entire government databases—flight records, casino-employee lists, the names of Americans hosting foreign-exchange students and many others. The agency has new authority to keep data about innocent U.S. citizens for up to five years, and to analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior. Previously, both were prohibited. Data about Americans "reasonably believed to constitute terrorism information" may be." Read more
Labels:
government,
information sharing,
privacy