Showing posts with label medical records. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical records. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Patient Portal Explosion Has Major Health Care Implications
Labels:
health IT,
medical records,
point of view
Thursday, January 17, 2013
EHR Adoption Could Exceed 80 Percent by End of 2013, New Study Finds
Labels:
medical records,
stats
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Mining Electronic Records for Revealing Health Data
But the report neglected one powerful incentive for the switch to electronic records: the resulting databases of clinical information are gold mines for medical research. The monitoring and analysis of electronic medical records, some scientists say, have the potential to make every patient a participant in a vast, ongoing clinical trial, pinpointing treatments and side effects that would be hard to discern from anecdotal case reports or expensive clinical trials." Read more
Labels:
Data Mining,
health IT,
medical records
Why Electronic Health Records Failed
The savings were significant but not unreasonable: It would represent less than a 1 percent cut to health-care spending, much smaller than the 1.5 percent efficiency increase the retail sector saw when it went digital.
Seven years later, those savings have not materialized." Read more
Labels:
health IT,
medical records,
point of view
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
ONC Delves into Patients' Privacy Concerns
From the article: "In considering whether to participate in a health
information exchange, patients want to know whether their clinical information
will be shared with their insurance company and whether their more sensitive
information, in addition to routine patient information, will be included.
They also want to know whether, once they have opted into a health information exchange, they can ever opt back out.
These were the findings of a survey of patients at four
healthcare organizations in western New York state who participated in the
eConsent Trial Project sponsored by HHS' Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology." Read more
Labels:
health IT,
medical records,
privacy
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Digital Health Funding Rose 45 Percent in 2012
Huessner, Ki Mae. "Digital Health Funding Rose 45 Percent in 2012." GigaOm, January 7, 2013.
From the article: "According to health tech accelerator Rock Health, investors
poured $1.4 billion into digital health companies last year, which is up 45
percent from 2011. The major areas of interest include healthcare purchasing
tools for consumers, personal health tracking, Electronic Medical records and
hospital administration." Read more
Labels:
digital economy,
health IT,
medical records,
stats
Copying Common in Electronic Medical Records
Stokes, Trevor. "Copying Common in Electronic Medical Records." Reuters. January 4, 2013.
See also
From the article: "Most doctors copy and paste old, potentially
out-of-date information into patients' electronic records, according to a new
study looking at a shortcut that some experts fear could lead to
miscommunication and medical errors…Using plagiarism-detection software, the
researchers analyzed five months' worth of progress notes for 135 patients.
They found that 82 percent of residents' notes and 74 percent of attending
physicians' notes included 20 percent or more copied and pasted material from
the patients' records." Read more
See also
Labels:
medical errors,
medical records,
reports
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Health-Care Sector Vulnerable to Hackers, Researchers Say
From the article: "As the health-care industry rushed onto the Internet in
search of efficiencies and improved care in recent years, it has exposed a wide
array of vulnerable hospital computers and medical devices to hacking,
according to documents and interviews." Read more
Labels:
Healthcare,
medical records,
privacy
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
EHRs May Turn Small Errors Into Big Ones
From the article: "As electronic health record systems become more interconnected, errors may
propagate much farther than under old paper-based systems, a recent study
suggested.
According to a review by the PennsylvaniaPatient Safety Authority, mistakes and near misses involving
electronic health records were analogous to those made with paper-based records
with one caveat: those made with EHRs tend to be amplified and can affect a
larger group of people.
The Authority's study looked at 3,099 reports from Pennsylvania hospitals detailing 3,946 problems. More than 2,700 incidents involved near misses and 15 involved temporary harm to patients.
The study focused on incidents from 2004 to 2012 in which electronic health records were the root cause in the event, as opposed to being incidental.
Electronic health records are designed to be more efficient than paper-based records, but the two systems have one thing in common: they're developed and maintained by people. The most common source of problems identified in the study rested with data entry and, to a much lesser extent, with technical glitches.
Medication errors accounted for about 80% of the cases, or 2,516 reports. Many of the remainder involved lab tests." Read more
Labels:
medical errors,
medical records,
stats
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Smartphone Use: Good for Healthcare
At a Dec. 10 report-release briefing, Janet Marchabroda, chair of the Health IT Initiative at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said smartphones have changed every aspect of American life, including the way Americans shop, travel and manage their finances. "If we could apply that use of smartphones to healthcare, great things would result, she said.
Barriers on the consumer side often include lack of awareness that the apps are out there, and more innovation is still needed in the marketplace.
See also
Labels:
emerging technology,
health IT,
medical records,
mobile apps
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Computerized Health Records Breed Digital Discontent For Some Doctors
One is a lot of unhappy doctors. In a big survey by Medscape, an online site for doctors, 38 percent of the doctors polled said they were unhappy with their electronic medical records system." Read more
Labels:
health IT,
impact of tech,
medical records
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
HHS Publishes Guidance on How to De-Identify Protected Health Information
From the article: "On November 26, 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of
Civil Rights (“OCR”) published guidance on the
two methods for de-identifying protected health information (“PHI”) in
accordance with the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The guidance, which was required by the
Health Information Technology for Clinical and Economic Health (“HITECH”) Act,
has been developed over several years by OCR in collaboration with healthcare
entities and other industry experts and builds upon the discussions from a
workshop on de-identification that took place in March 2010.
The guidance covers three main topics: (1) key terms in the HIPAA Privacy
Rule, (2) the statistical expert method for de-identifying PHI, and (3) the
safe harbor method for de-identifying PHI." Read more
See also
Labels:
health IT,
HIPAA,
medical records,
privacy
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Patients Want Granular Privacy Control Over Health Information in Electronic Medical Records
Labels:
information sharing,
medical records,
privacy,
reports
Monday, November 26, 2012
The Impact of Electronic Patient Portals on Patient Care: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
From the report: "Modern information technology is
changing and provides new challenges to health care. The emergence of the
Internet and the electronic health record (EHR) has brought new opportunities
for patients to play a more active role in his/her care. Although in many
countries patients have the right to access their clinical information, access
to clinical records electronically is not common. Patient portals consist of
provider-tethered applications that allow patients to electronically access
health information that are documented and managed by a health care
institution. Although patient portals are already being implemented, it is still
unclear in which ways these technologies can influence patient care." Read more
Labels:
Health care,
health IT,
medical records,
reports
Thursday, November 15, 2012
A Survey of Primary Care Doctors in Ten Countries Shows Progress in Use of Health Information Technology, Less in Other Areas
Schoen, Cathy, et al. "A Survey of Primary Care Doctors in Ten Countries Shows Progress in Use of Health Information Technology, Less in Other Areas." The Common Wealth Fund, November 15, 2012.
From the article:
From the article:
- Two-thirds (69%) of U.S. primary care physicians reported using EMRs in 2012, up from less than half (46%) in 2009. Both U.S. and Canadian doctors expanded their use of health information technology (HIT), though the two countries lag the U.K., New Zealand, and Australia in EMRs and use of HIT to perform a range of functions, like generating patient information or ordering diagnostic tests.
- In the U.S.—the only country in the survey without universal health coverage—59 percent of physicians said their patients often have trouble paying for care. Far fewer physicians in Norway (4%), the U.K. (13%), Switzerland (16%), Germany (21%), and Australia (25%) reported affordability was a concern for their patients.
- More than half (52%) of U.S. doctors said they or their staff spend too much time dealing with insurers’ restrictions on covered treatments or medications—by far the highest rate in the survey. Read more
Labels:
EHR,
health IT,
medical records,
stats,
survey
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Hospitals Use Patient Data to Target Ads
Sutherly, Ben. "Hospitals Use Patient Data to Target Ads." The Columbus Dispatch, November 12, 2012.
OhioHealth and Mount Carmel Health System routinely mine health data from their patients’ records to decide who should receive certain mailings. The approach — sometimes called “ customer-relationship management” — has been used for six years by OhioHealth and two years by Mount Carmel. Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center hasn’t used it, but it plans to take another look at the tactic soon, a spokesman said." Read more
Labels:
Data Mining,
Health care,
medical records,
privacy
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Despite ONC's Effort, Comparing PHR Privacy Policies Still Challenging
From the article: "To date, personal health record adoption has been somewhat limited, but the
market is expected to get a big boost from Stage 2 of the meaningful use
incentive program.
Deven McGraw -- director of the Health Privacy Project at the Center for
Democracy & Technology -- said, "The market for those tools has been a
little soft I think because people have really had to hand enter in the data or
scan [them] in, as opposed to being able to feed [the information] directly
from a provider's electronic health record, unless they happen to be a patient
at Kaiser or part of a system that already offers them that tool."
However, she said, "That's going to change in 2014 when a lot of the early
adopters in the HITECH incentive program begin Stage 2 and start actively
encouraging patients to view and potentially download and transmit their
data."
But is the industry ready when it comes to privacy and security regulations?" Read more
Labels:
health IT,
medical records,
point of view,
privacy
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Big Bad Data: Law, Public Health, and Biomedical Databases
From the report: "The
accelerating adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems will have
profound impacts on clinical care. It will also have far-reaching implications
for public health research and surveillance, which in turn could lead to
changes in public policy, statutes, and regulations. The public health benefits
of EHR use can be significant. However, researchers and analysts who rely on EHR
data
must proceed with caution and understand the potential limitations of EHRs.
Much has been written about the risk of EHR privacy breaches. This paper focuses on a different set of concerns, those relating to data quality. EHR data can be erroneous, miscoded, fragmented, and incomplete. In addition, if causation is at issue, analysts must grapple with the complexities of causal inference. Public health findings can be tainted by the problems of selection bias, confounding bias, and measurement bias. These and other obstacles can easily lead to invalid conclusions and unsound public health policies.
The paper will highlight the public health uses of EHRs. It will also probe the shortcomings of EHR information and the challenges of collecting and analyzing it. Finally, we outline several regulatory and other interventions to address data analysis difficulties." Read more
Labels:
medical records,
population health,
privacy,
reports
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
CMS: $7.7 Billion in EHR Payments through September
From the article: "More than 300,000 physicians and other eligible
professionals have signed up to participate in the federal electronic
health-record system incentive payment programs, while more than 4,000
hospitals have enrolled in the Medicare EHR incentive program, the Medicaid
incentive program or both, according to the latest CMS data.
In total, $7.7 billion has been paid out in what has been estimated will be $27 billion in incentive payments through the lives of the two programs." Read more
In total, $7.7 billion has been paid out in what has been estimated will be $27 billion in incentive payments through the lives of the two programs." Read more
Labels:
Health care,
medical records,
stats
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
HHS Questions GOP Calls to Suspend Meaningful Use
Versel, Neil. "HHS Questions GOP Calls to Suspend Meaningful Use." Healthcare IT News, October 23, 2012.
From the article: "Health and Human Services officials, who spoke this week at the CHIME12
Annual Fall Forum, are pushing back against Republican questions of the
appropriateness of the $27 billion meaningful use EHR Incentive Program.
Four GOP senators sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Oct. 17 questioning whether government-subsidized EHRs sometimes actually promote higher utilization of diagnostic testing and whether wider EHR adoption so far has increased Medicare billing." Read more
Four GOP senators sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Oct. 17 questioning whether government-subsidized EHRs sometimes actually promote higher utilization of diagnostic testing and whether wider EHR adoption so far has increased Medicare billing." Read more
Labels:
Health care,
medical records,
point of view